Project Overview

Project Owner: Anika Gupta (UX Designer)

Background: This project focuses on evaluating the Kroger Ad Platform (KAP) to identify critical feature gaps and develop a feature recommendation that will add value for advertisers to optimize their campaigns.

Scope

Product Research

Information Architecture

Testing

Duration

10 Weeks Worked 5x a Week

Tools

Figma

JIRA

The Problem: There is a gap between the features currently offered by Kroger’s Ad Platform (KAP) and those available on leading platforms, limiting its ability to meet advertiser needs.

The Solution: I designed an intuitive A/B testing tool for the KAP that addressed a key feature gap identified through competitive analysis and stakeholder feedback. My design focused on simplifying the setup and enabling advertisers to run data-driven experiments and optimize their campaigns more effectively.

My Role:

Product Research, Competitive Analysis, Stakeholder Interviews, and User Research, Ideation, Wireframing, Prototyping, A/B Testing

Discovery

Def

ine

Design

Testing

Design Process

Investigation of Ad Platforms

Determining which feature to design

Designing the Feature

Evaluating the Designs

Discovery

Investigation of Ad Platforms

Understanding Ad Platforms:

I started by researching Kroger, Walmart, Amazon, and other ad platforms to understand how these ad platforms work and what they do. They all follow a basic userflow with the same goals of helping an advertiser create a campaign for their product.



Camapaign Creation Process:


Example of Information Architecture:

There are a lot of terminologies in Ad Platforms like ad groups and creatives. The best way to understand them is through their information hierachy.

Organizing My Research:

After understanding the structure of ad platforms, I gathered screenshots from other competing ad platforms and arranged the screenshots by the standard userflow on these platforms.

Optimizing My Research:

With a lot of different information, I wanted to figure out how to consolidate it with the help of Perplexity, an ai-powered search engine, which is great for research. It gave me competitive analysis tables and sources to expedite my work.

Competitive Analysis

I put all the information from the research and analysis of platforms into a final competitive analysis which were highlighting features that Kroger's Ad Platform is missing.


From a product perspective, the research identified potential features, but the focus now was on choosing one that would truly deliver value to advertisers, rather than becoming just another unused addition.

Def

ine

Determining which feature to design

Filtering through the options:

To figure out what feature to design, it required weighing multiple factors, which led me to narrow the list down to five potential options.


Factors:

  • Industry Research: The competitive analysis and research

  • Internal Feedback: Interviews with designers and product managers working on KAP about stand-out features.

  • Business Value: Product managers looked at the list and talked about the value add for the business.


Final 5 Features:

These are features that have been implemented in top platforms already and advertisers have been asking Kroger Ad Platform to integrate them.

Competitive Landscape

Analyzing how these features compared across competitors revealed that some were unique gaps in Kroger’s Ad Platform.

Feature Ranking Interviews:

To narrow five potential features down to one, I interviewed:

  • 3 KAP activiation team members who work closely with advertisers

  • 5 product managers who understand feature value and feasibility


These interviews focused on identifying the the most usable, desirable, and feasible option for KAP ranked on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being high, 5 being low).

Interview Results:

I calculated weighted averages of the features, leaving me with 1 cummulative value for each feature.

The interviewes put the A.I performance recommendations feature as their top. I wanted to investigate this more because I had interviewee notes.

After looking at the interviewee notes, I began to realize that A/B testing tools might be the right feature to go ahead with.

Scoring Matrix:

To make sure A/B testing tools was the right feature to go ahead with, I made a value matrix to compare the effort by business vs. value for users based on a few factors.


Factors:

  • Interviewee Feedback

  • Interview Data Results

  • Competitive Analysis


This left me to conclude A/B Testing Tools

as the final feature as it was both lower effort

by the business to implement and advertisers

really wanted it on the platform.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.